By Michael Moriarty

Now that Khrushchev and Gorbachev seem like distant bogeymen or avuncular diplomats, North American people believe that Communism is dead; and, while that Big Lie is maintained daily, the entire formula for Soviet Communism arises within our society. Its complete master is George Soros, a naturalized American citizen whose family appeared to have been saved from Hitler by Stalin. I’m sure a certain amount of gratitude is in order, but to betray one’s own country over it? Inside reports on the Bush administration use words like "Trotskyite" to describe Soros. Whatever divisions are going on in the White House appear to mirror similar upheavals during Stalin’s rise to power.

Way ahead of the game plan is Soros, who foresees the ultimate fall of Capitalism "as we know it" and a whole new idea of how to "make our money grow," or in his corner of the operation, "make the government’s money grow." Soros is firmly convinced that he will someday be managing most of the money controlled by governments in order to "make it grow."

Beneath his eagle’s eye view sits George W. Bush, whose Daddy Warbucks father, George H.W. Bush, set up a nice THIRD WAY deal with his seeming political opponent, former President William J. Clinton. It is virtually the marriage of Capitalism and a Socialist form of Communism devised by Clinton. Both ex-presidents have been seen together traipsing around disaster sites, like tsunami-ravaged Indonesia and beleaguered New Orleans.

The Communist Movement, begun in Paris in the 18th Century, has, over the past 216 years, only made two major changes in its Politburo thinking. One, instead of going after the rich first, use the rich to imprison the masses and then kill the rich. Two, in order to avoid any future Maos, Stalins, Pol Pots, Milosevics or Kim Jong Ils, make sure there are two leaders to every federation and not one. One leader will keep an eye on the other one.

I call these leaders Napoleons to remind the reader where the whole psychosis came from in the first place: France. Until its godless vision of the Truth is firmly in place, the French Republic required Napoleons, military geniuses, to force its Truth down the throats of the human race. The greatest of the latter-day Napoleons was Mao Zedong.

Therefore, we have two leaders of China and now two leaders of America: William J. Clinton and George H.W. Bush.

This phenomenon has come closer to my home up here in Canada with the eager entrance of a man named Terry O’Neill. He works for an ostensibly conservative magazine called the WESTERN STANDARD. The West was the birthplace of the conservative Reform Party under Preston Manning. A very Christian-based set of Founding Fathers -- who basically said that the Tories and Progressive Conservative parties were led by the rich of Bay Street into an accommodation with the Liberals -- began to reestablish true conservative thought and upset the Bay Street apple cart, its Trudeau/Mulroney agreement to press Socialism forward while still maintaining the appearance of democracy.

In comes O’Neill, bragging about the conservative commitment of his magazine, the WESTERN STANDARD, announcing that he can help broadcast my conservative views to a mass audience. Beware of such generous conservatives. They’re placed amid the true conservatives to sabotage them. The Reform Party had already become a bigger threat to both Canadian political parties than anything that had come along in quite a while. I predicted a Reformer, Stockwell Day, would win the conservative leadership in Parliament and I was right. For saying so, the Wall Street Journal came to me for an interview, asking, "Why does Michael Moriarty know so much about Canadian politics? What’s up with that?" I knew that average Canadians would trust Day more than they would the suspiciously liberal conservative Tom Long. When Conrad Black, another Bay Street Conservative, ordered his National Post to put Long on the front page and bury Day in the back pages, I could see the schism developing in the Canadian Conservative Movement.

Why did I know?

To put it succinctly, I had met the American Liberal/Democratic Party’s Janet Reno, Attorney General of the United States, and knew I was listening to a virtual Leninist. Whereas Clinton had wafted Socialist and clearly Marxist formulae before the American public, his wife, who had picked Reno for the position, was much more impatient with the proceedings. Within less than four months, Reno had been sent on a virtual Leninist’s job, to clean out a Christian cult in Texas. The David Koresh Compound was so far from the Christian mainstream that it looked like a safe bet for the Clinton Administration’s nascent Leninist policies to warm up on. Portraits of Koresh’s extremism were broadcast in headlines by the liberal press and 80 men women and children died on April 19th, 1993.

These very accurate labels of mine; descriptions of figures like Reno and Clinton are disturbing to a man like Terry O’Neill.

How consciously he has adopted the Soviet means of discrediting true conservatives is an open question. However, his coverage of an interview with me was classic Soviet strategy.

Paint Michael Moriarty as a paranoid anti-Communist and a schizophrenic Christian. I am a Christian and one of a kind, as I say in the interview. My Lord and the Bible have so revealed the true nature of Communism and its inner workings. My labels are accurate and the burgeoning betrayal of America by Soviet Conservatives is increasingly obvious.

The Soviets dealt with political dissidents in Russia by announcing their opponent’s insanity in a variety of ways, convincing friends of the dissident that he or she was crazy and having them locked up in sanitariums or, in the frequent case of the Soviet Union, slave camps in Siberia or an execution chamber in Lubyanka Prison, the wastebasket Stalin used for his infamous purges of the 1930s.

If any government, including the American, Clinton/Bush administrations over these past 17 years, can sit idly by and watch American gestating infants butchered at the rate of 1.5 million each year, we’re into a Maoist ruthlessness so cold, so unfeeling that even Waco, by now, looks, to men like O’Neill at least, like a mild slap on the wrist.

I can already feel the impact of O’Neill’s article on my own campaign team. He so deftly accented my eccentricities, more sharply in focus because I believed that he was sincere in his offer of help and I was energized by the opportunity to warn America of what had already happened in Canada – the Trudeau/Mulroney end run around democracy – that I pressed that issue forcefully at the outset. I said, "I feel like a stranded man on an island and can you, Terry, act as a kind of bottle to help my message get to America?"

He, of course, made a complete lie out of my description and twisted it into an absurd exaggeration of Trudeau’s power. Quite deft. Quite Soviet.

This battle with Terry O’Neill and the WESTERN STANDARD isn’t over. Meaghan Walker-Williams, a friend of mine in the conservative movement, had a run-in with another reporter for the STANDARD - Kate McMillan. Two such unsavory journalists are a clear indication that a third will show up to defend the magazine’s policies. That is when it will become very interesting.

I already know that the Bush Empire in the United States has more than enough Soviet Conservatives to push forward its agenda. Writer Nicholas Stix is one of them. He offers strongman Rudolph Giuliani as the best man for the American Presidency. There you go.