OUR DIVINE ANIMALITY
By Michael Moriarty
I wonder what Charles Darwin might think if he were alive today, as the virtual Empire of Progressive Liberalism climbs up the back of his The Origin of Species, carrying the operator’s manuals of Marxism: Das Kapital and The Communist Manifesto. We are now aware of the thousand-year plan of social engineer Sir Francis Galton, who envisioned a new and improved humanity created by Eugenics: the scientific usurpation of human evolution by Man, leaving our Father Almighty, that Divine Intelligence of Creation, and our Mother Earth bereft of any say in the New World Order.
We are mammals engaged in an institutionalized thinning of our own herd by abortion and tacit approval of ethnic cleansings in Africa, where the governing architecture of godless Socialism prevails.
Galton analyzed The Origin of Species. All the bloodletting throughout human history confirmed Darwin’s doctrine of the survival of the fittest, and therefore Galton concluded that scientists were obliged to use death deliberately as the major cure for Mankind’s ills, and the cadavers, the specimens from all that death, would serve as microscopes through which to envision the perfect man and woman, and all in the name of progress.
Can the human race be taught to bow before a God by the name of Science? As one of the pagan religions of human sacrifice, Science is indeed the unparalleled God of them all.
The Bible condemns all religions of human sacrifice except that of Christ, in which God came down to sacrifice Himself in order to end all human sacrifice, and to teach us the eternal meaning of Humanity as a force reflecting (but not usurping) the Divine. We are urged to follow the laws of nature and "be fruitful and multiply."
Never has Evil so infected human consciousness as now, when Progressive Liberals behave like Nazis and Planned Parenthood is neo-speak for Eugenics. With "moral ambivalence," these progressives will continue to fog the minds of our children.
"Don’t you see the moral ambivalence in 9/11?"
Their certainty of "moral ambivalence" is the measure of "progress" toward our acceptance of death. "RU486 or against it?" The rewards it is bringing – "Crime, poverty and hunger lowered exponentially by abortion!," scream the headlines in progressive newspapers and magazines – versus the seeming insensitivity of the United Nations towards Rwanda.
Sir Winston Churchill called Eugenics "the perverse science." The Clintons called the faith within the Koresh compound "perverse religion," and provoked the incineration of 80 men, women and children.
Which is the greater molestation of a child? Sexual assault or death by abortion or, as in the case of Waco, incineration? You tell me.
Even slaves and Vietnam War protesters had a chance to escape to Canada. Where’s the escape route for gestating infants?
"Do unto gestating infants what you would not want done unto your own gestating infancy."
That is the New and Improved Golden Rule under Progressive Liberal Protestants. The silence around the subject of abortion in the United Church of Canada and the Church of England is deafening.
We ARE animals. There’s no denying that now.
Aside from Darwin’s undeniable proof, there’s a depth of homicidal animality in the surgically robed physicians of abortion that makes tribal warfare look like a domestic dispute. Over 1.5 million abortions a year are performed in America alone! That is not including those unborn children poisoned by the RU486 abortion pill.
There is death going on now, all over the world, prompted by Man: a humanicide that leaves all plagues, wars, ethnic cleansings and genocides, tsunamis and forces majeures in the minor league of massacres.
How can the human race, led by the highest intellects, with IQs in the 180s, be as ignorant as lemmings, to simply let our Rhodes Scholars and Nobel Prizewinners help us run off the cliff and into death?
We are Divine Animals!
There is, as Galton repeatedly pointed out, Hereditary Genius. There is also Divine Genius, as epitomized by Sir Winston Churchill.
Recently, Rudolph Giuliani likened himself to Churchill. And yet the former Mayor of New York favours abortion on demand.
I ponder what Sir Winston might say about a pro-abortionist imitator. Likely: "How dare a would-be Mussolini like Giuliani even pretend to know my name, let alone proselytize a perverse science, and assume my identity!"